Table linen sales flat
June 17, 2002,
Suppliers cited several factors for the table linen category's flat results in 2001 — sales leveled off at $660 million — including the commodity approach by suppliers and the growth of competitive categories.
"It's been flat for several years because there is no imagination or initiative in this business," said Kurt Hamburger, president and managing director, New York-based Lintex Linens. "Everybody runs after each other, and everyone knocks off and destroys any good item."
Distribution of table linens remained strongest at the discount store level, which took 54 percent of the market share, or $356 million total — a 12.5 percent increase over 2000.
Bud Frankel, president, New York-based Arlee, said table linen sales have been flat because of the growth in place mats at the expense of tablecloths.
"The consumer doesn't have time to wash tablecloths," Frankel said. "It's easier for her to use place mats, and it's more of a fashion today."
But the large volume of store closings and Chapter 11 filings and retailers' push to lower price points were more to blame for the category's lackluster year, said Eric Vergucht, executive vp and general manager, New York-based Terrisol.
"We gained new customers, but we have lost some old customers because of the changes that occurred at retail and the many store closings," he said.
Longtime industry veteran George Matouk Sr., president of New York-based Matouk, said there is "a lack of customer awareness of table linens."
Strong fourth-quarter holiday business may have been largely responsible for maintaining annual table linens sales. That was the case for many suppliers, including Long Beach, CA-based Foreston Trends.
"We were happy to maintain our standing thanks to the fourth quarter; and even though it was affected by [the terrorist events of] Sept. 11, our harvest business was very strong," said Richard Gould, vp, sales manager, Foreston Trends.
Park B. Smith Ltd., based in New York, also experienced a spike in sales during the fourth quarter for its holiday product.
"We had our largest sell-through in the history of our company last Christmas, which catapulted our sales at February mini-market," said Park B. Smith Jr., president and ceo.
Overall, importing grew by 6 percent from 2000 to 2001, making up 89 percent, or $587 million, vs. domestic manufacturing, which shrunk by 31.3 percent, representing 11 percent of the business.
At Louisville, KY-based Louisville Bedding, importing has been on a steady incline over the past two years, with further growth projected for 2002.
"Importing has driven the sell price down, but we have no choice but to import in order to stay competitive," said Pat Rudavsky, national sales manager, fashion, Louisville Bedding. "For us, 45 percent to 50 percent of our goods are imported."
The role of licensing declined by 33.3 percent to a mere 8 percent share of the business vs. non-licensed goods, which make up 92 percent, or $607 million, of the business.